If you read my
previous notes on Italy or the most recent on Champagne you probably noticed
that they tend to be rather lengthy and perhaps too long. In studying and writing about wine there is a great
challenge in trying to be concise and to the point and yet also sufficiently
thorough so as to understand various wine regions well enough to pass Advanced
Sommelier exams for the Court of Master Sommeliers or the WSET Diploma exams. Another
challenge to retain and be able to recall from memory all of the information.
My goal in writing these notes (or papers) is to create a data base which I can
read from my iPhone and from which I create flash cards. But, I have also
started the WSET Level 4 Diploma so until the end of April my time is divided
between two studies.
The
following are my notes for studying the wines of the Côte d’Or region of France
including information about the history, topography, climate, soils, important
red and white grapes and the AOCs of the region. I also include notes on the
wines tasted during in the French Wine Scholar class (FWS - 03a Côte D’Or).
The Viticultural History of
the Cote D’Or
Understanding
the viticultural history of France and most of Europe involves the complexity
and intertwining of the country’s religion, politics, economics and wars. 
The first to
cultivate the native grape of the land we now call Bourgogne was more than
likely the Celtic tribes who lived in the region prior to the arrival of the
Roman Empire in 52 A.D. According to archaeological evidence the Romans then planted
numerous vineyards on the flat plains near Gevrey-Chambertin, south of Dijon. The
earliest written record of viticulture dates a few centuries later during the
reign of Emperor Constantine in 312 A.D..[1] 
During the 4th
and 5th centuries the Roman Empire was in great decline as invading
Germanic tribes crossed the Rhine (406 A.D.) and Rome was sacked twice (410
A.D; 455 A.D.). 
 
After the fall of
Rome the Catholic Church became an important leader in not only religious
affairs but it also preserved literature and viticulture. Specifically, it was
the Benedictine and the Cistercian orders that became the most influential
during the Middle Ages as they forged the land building monasteries and mapping
out the best vineyards. 
The Benedictines
As early as the
year 630 A.D., Duke Amalgaire of Lower Bourgogne gave the monks of the Abbey of
Bèze the at Gevry, Vosne and Beaune and what today is the Grand Cru Chambertin-Clos de
Bèze.[2]
In 910, the
Benedictines built the Abbey of Cluny near Mâcon, and from there they extended
their influence throughout Europe.[3] By the 11th
century, it was the most influential monastery in the Europe as the Benedictine
monks expanded the vineyards and wine cellars of Bourgogne. In 1131, the
Benedictines planted what today is the most prestigious Pinot Noir vineyard in
the world - “Clos de Cinq Journaux” which is now known as Romanée-Conti. By the
1200s the Abbey held prime vineyard land in the Côte de Nuits including “Champ
Bertin” (Chambertin) as well as in the Mâconnais and Côte Chalonnaise. 
The Cistercians
Following in the
footsteps of Benedictines was the Cistercian Order which takes its name from the
Abbey of Cîteaux, founded near Dijon in 1098.[4] The Cistercians
founded the first clos vineyards as they built walls around the vineyard
and the winemaking facilities in the monasteries. The Abbey of Cîteaux signature
vineyard was the Clos de Vougeot which consists of a large collection of
parcels acquired during the 12th through the 14th centuries. In 1114, the
Cistercian Abbey of Pontigny was established as the second of the four great daughter houses of Abbey of Cîteaux
and it expanded viticulture in the northern area of Chablis. The Cistercian
monks cultivated Musigny, Echézeaux, Richebourg, and Montrachet gaining them a
reputation as land-clearers as they expanded Burgundy’s
agricultural landscape and laid the foundation for the modern climats of
Burgundy. In 1141, Clos de Tart
(situated in the commune of Morey-Saint-Denis) was sold by Maison Dieu in
Brochon to the Cistercian nuns of Notre Dame de Tart who owned it until the
French Revolution. 
The Dukes of Bourgogne
From 1363-1477 the
Dukes of Bourgogne ruled the Duchy of Bourgogne west of the Saône River to what is today Belgium. The Dukes wielded a great
deal of political power and financial influence derived from the textile
industry. There were four Dukes and although the King of France also assumed
the title “Duke of Bourgogne” the Bourgogne region of France remained
independent until the death of Charles le Téméraire (Charles the Bold)
who lived from 10 November 1433 – 5 January 1477.
| 
The Dukes | 
Reign | 
| 
Philippe the Bold | 
1363 - 1404 | 
| 
John the Fearless | 
1404 - 1419 | 
| 
Philippe the Good | 
1419 - 1467 | 
| 
Charles the Bold | 
1467 - 1477 | 
These Dukes were
strong advocates of Burgundian wine and they helped established the region’s
reputation as they supplied wine for the papacy which at the time was located
in Avignon. Until the mid 1400s what was labeled as Vin de Bourgogne was
produced in Chablis and the wines of the Côte d’Or were known as
Vins de Beaune.
In the 1300s Gamay,
a high yielding and easier to grow grape, was the dominant wine for the
commoner while Pinot Noir, a finicky and difficult grape, was served to the
nobility. This came to an end when Philippe the Bold outlawed Gamay and it
moved to Beaujolais where it founds its lasting home on more well-suited soils.
In 1416, Jean sans Peur (John the Fearless), son of Philippe the Bold, changed the
zone of production from Sens to Mâcon.
The Recognition of the Terroir and
Establishment of Climats in Bourgogne
The word terroir is
a French term that translates loosely into “sense of place,” suggesting how the
intersection of climate, soil type and topography influence the character of a
wine. The
identity of single vineyards was developed by the medieval monks who recognized
the unique terroir of certain
vineyards. This was then solidified in the 15th century under the leadership of
the Valois Dukes who strove to limit plantings to the hillsides. During this
time a basic sense terroir was
already place and the wines from Beaune and Dijon were highly regarded cuvées
blended from different parcels in and around the two towns. Yet the designation
Vin de Beaune was a generic name that referred to many of the wines of
the Côte d’Or throughout the Late Middle Ages. 
Then
the Greek
word klima (κλίμα), from which we get the English word “climate,” was
adopted to refer to a site’s incline and exposure to the sun. It was first used
in a more general sense to denote parcels of land, but from then it became
limited to the indication of specific vineyards. A
climat then refers to an actual site, specifically a vineyard, which is
unique because of its geographic characteristics, or terroir. In
the 1500s, the association of geographic names and wine quality progressed and greater
attention was given to smaller and more specific geographical areas. 
The French Revolution, the Napoleonic Code
and The Fragmentation of Vineyards
By the end of the
17th century the wines of Bourgogne had become the most expensive in
France which only the wealthy could afford. During that time the French royalty
and nobility built Château along the Loire
River and began drinking Loire wines which created some competition for
Bourgogne wines.
Then came the
French Revolution (1789 - 1799), which had the domino effect of the global decline of theocracies
and absolute monarchies while replacing them with republics and democracies.
During this time church lands were confiscated and redistributed to the farmers
who worked the lands and the great domains were divided and sold at auction with
only a few surviving monopoles.
But
the fragmentation
of the vineyards did not end with the sale of church and aristocratic lands to
multiple bidders. The Revolutionary General Napoleon Bonaparte (15 August 1769 – 5 May 1821), ended the
practice of primogeniture (the right of succession belonging to the firstborn child) in France. In
1804 he established The Napoleonic Code created a new hereditary law that all
male citizens would receive an equal portion of the land in their in
inheritance. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that within a few
generations of properties begin continually divided amongst all male heirs that
the great vineyards of Bourgogne would be so fragmented that some families
would end up only perhaps only a single row in a vineyard which is hardly
enough to establish a winery or produce a significant amount of wine. Consequently, Clos de Vougeot, which was created by
Cistercian monks of Cîteaux Abbey, today has over 100 owners even though it
only consists of 50.6 hectares (125 acres) with only 47.3 hectares (116.88
acres) under vine. This splintering of estates among heirs continues today.
Modern Bourgogne
In 1847 King
Louis-Philipe granted the village of Gevrey the right to add its name to the
name of the vineyard so that it became Gevrey-Chambertin and many other
villages likewise appended their name to their vineyards except for Volnay,
Meusault, and Pommard which do not have and Grand Cru vineyards. The goal was
to increase the value of other vineyards by branding the name Chambertin such
that if it was associated with quality consumers might purchase other wines
using the name. So, there are actually 9
Chambertin vineyards, including Chambertin-Clos de Bèze. Other villages that
also append their name to vineyards include Puligny and Chassagne which share
Montrachet, Chambolie which claims Musigny and Morey which claims Clos St.
Denis.[5]
Here is where it gets confusing and knowing the vineyards
becomes essential. With the above information one might then think that all
hyphenated names on Burgundian wine labels indicate a village-vineyard
relationship. But there are a number of exceptions. For example,
Nuit-Saint-George is a Premier Cru (with 41 climats), Ladoix-Serrigny are two
hamlets (Lieu-dits) as Serrigny is not a vineyard.
In 1859 the first wine auction was held at the Hospices de
Beaune which set a precedent for wine tourism and wine charity events. Like
many other regions of France, in the 1890s Bourgogne was plagued by Phyloxera
so the region had to replant their vineyards on American rootstock. In doing so
vignerons planted in a more orderly fashion than their predecessors who had
haphazardly planted vines in the past. Many employed the Guyot system which
increased the vine’s efficiency and provided a better control of production. 
In the 1936 AOC legislation legally defined Bourgogne’s
boundaries and legislated the regions named climats and parcels. 
In 1986 60% of Bourgogne’s wine produciton was red. Then there
was a dramatic shift in plantings as a greater demand for white wines increased
and consequently more Chardonnay was planted such that it now accounts for 66%
of wine production. However, it was not that Pinot Noir was uprooted in favor
of Chardonnay, rather Chablis and the Mâconnais expanded their vineyard plantings.[6]
| 
Geography
  of Bourgogne 
The Côte d’Or is
  part of the larger French wine region Bourgogne (the British name “Burgundy”
  is being phased out) which runs from Auxerre in the north to Lyon in
  Beaujolais in the south with Mâcon in the middle. The name Côte d’Or means “hill of gold” as the word côte means ‘coast’ (from Latin costa “side”), de means
  “of” and Or means “gold”. The Côte d’Or is located 85 miles southeast of Chablis and is
  divided into two parts: the Côte de Nuits which begins south of Dijon and ends
  at Corgoloin, a few kilometers south of the town of Nuits-Saint-Georges, and
  the Côte de Beaune which starts at Ladoix and ends at Dezize-les-Maranges.  | ||
| 
Topography of the Côte
  d’Or 
The vineyards of
  Bourgogne are on hills and slopes for about 100 miles along the western side
  of the Saône Valley. The plateau of the Côte d’Or is about 500 feet above the
  valley which has an elevation of about 725 feet.[7] The width of the Côte d’Or’s vineyards are rarely more
  than 2 kilometers (1.25 miles), running from the base of the slope to the
  forest edge at the summit, and vines are rarely at an altitude of more than
  400 meters (1,300 feet). 
Most of the
  vineyards of Bourgogne are planted on slopes and they can become quite steep,
  reaching a 35% grade near the vineyards’ upper limits. The crests of the
  hilltops are covered with forests interspersed with vineyards designated
  Haute Côte de Nuit or Haute Côte de Beaune. The soil on the peaks of the
  slope have thin topsoil and it receives the least amount of rain. The middle and higher part of
  the slopes receive the most exposure to sunshine and the best drainage so
  they are designated as the Grand Cru vineyards. The Premier Cru
  are below Grand Cru vineyards on the slopes while the Village wines are produced from the
  flat territory which has the least amount of sun exposure and poorest
  drainage. | ||
| 
Soils of the Côte
  d’Or 
Generally, the
  soils of the Côte d’Or consist of Limestone and its topsoil is usually made
  up of a combination of limestone and clay. East of the forested plateaus
  above the Côte d’Or down-slope toward the Saône, there is an increase of clay
  in the soil. Soils in the Côte de Beaune, with the exception of Montrachet,
  tend to contain greater amounts of marl and less limestone than those in the
  Côte de Nuits.  
Ages ago the
  limestone escarpments of the Côte de Nuits and the Côte de Beaune rose upward
  as the plain collapsed creating a valley. The Saône River Plain then became
  filled with nitrogen-rich, damp cooler clay soils which are well suited for
  vegetal crops but not ideal for growing quality grapes.  | ||
| 
Climate 
Bourgogne has a continental climate characterized by cold
  winters and hot summers. The weather is very unpredictable with rain, hail,
  and frost in the spring and at harvest time.  | ||
| 
Vineyard Aspect of the Côte de Nuits and Côte de
  Beaune 
In General, the
  Côte de Nuits faces due east while the Côte de Beaune’s vineyards face
  southeast. The Côte de Beaune has about twice as much land under vine as the
  Côte de Nuits  and its hillsides are
  generally less steep although they can reach higher elevations overall,
  particularly at its southern end.  | ||
| 
The Viniculture of the Côte d’Or 
The Côte de
  Nuits and the Côte de Beaune produce more red wine than white. In fact, about
  95% of all wine produced in the Côte de Nuits is Pinot Noir. Conversely, all
  of the Grands Crus authorized to produce white wine are located in the
  Côte de Beaune, except for the Musigny Grand Cru. So, in general the better
  red wines of the Côte d’Or are in the north and the better white wines are in
  the south as Côte de Beaune reds are generally lighter in style. 
Barrels 
Higher quality red
  and white wines in the Côte d’Or are typically aged in oak. Grand Crus may
  be aged in 50-100% new oak while Village
  and Bourgogne AOP wines may see little
  or none. Côte de Nuits red wines will also show more new oak than those from
  the Côte de Beaune. The top red wines typically remain in barrel for 15-18
  months, whereas the best whites wines age for at least 12 months prior being
  in barrel.  
Whole Cluster Fermentation, Bâtonnage and Élevage 
There can be a
  range of styles of winemaking in the Côte d'Or, some red wine makers practice
  whole cluster fermentation, some de-stem entirely while others do partial
  whole cluster/de-stemming. Most white wines and all red wines undergo
  Malolactic Fermentation (MLF). In white wines, MLF converts tart-tasting
  malic acid, naturally present in grape must, to softer-tasting lactic acid.
  This is usually done after the end of the primary fermentation but in
  Bourgogne it is not done to the extent that is commonly found in California
  such that the wine becomes overly buttery. Ageing white wines on the lees, bâtonnage,
  is common and some
  winemakers also practice élevage - the stirring the wine’s lees during barrel ageing. In Bâtonnage
  dead
  yeast cell (lees) break down and they release all sorts of compounds such as
  mannoproteins, amino acids, polysaccharides and fatty acids, which interact
  with the fermented wine. This interaction with the wine creates complexity,
  aroma and flavor compounds, palate weight and texture in a wine. While the
  main reasons for deliberate lees aging tend to be stylistic in nature, lees
  absorb oxygen, thereby reducing the risk of any unwanted oxidation of the
  wine and helps maintain overall wine stability. | ||
| 
Key Grape Varieties | ||
| 
White | 
Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Pinot Gris (Pinot Beurot), Aligoté | |
| 
Red | 
Pinot Noir | |
| 
Top
  Vintages of Bourgogne 
Knowing the best vintages of Bourgogne is crucial in making
  the wise purchases. The following is a list of vintage evaluation from Jancis
  Robinson, MW.[8] The best years are in red. | ||
| 
2013 | 
A frigid spring delayed flowering and led to uneven ripening.
  Producers battled with hail (particularly in the Côte de Beaune) and summer
  downpours, but, despite the naysaying, a drier September allowed a small crop
  of balanced fruit with good potential. | |
| 
2012 | 
Blighted by rot, as a damp summer across Europe made
  conditions hard for vignerons, with mildew a particular problem. The weather
  was erratic and bizarre, with heatwaves, hail, a cold spring, thunderstorms
  and all manner of meteorological mischief. The net results are very low
  volumes of variable quality – but overall vignerons are surprised and
  delighted by what resulted. One hallmark of 2012 looks to be soft tannins. | |
| 
2011 | 
Disappointing quality with widespread rot and uneven weather
  conditions throughout the year. The results can be surprisingly good in
  parts, but 2010 is a much safer bet. | |
| 
2010 | 
A return to the high acid norm after 2009, and some very good quality - especially in the Côte de Nuits
  - but volumes up to a third lower than average. | |
| 
2009 | 
Finally, the Burgundians enjoyed a comparatively dry growing
  season with consistent warmth and no early season hail damage. Low acidity
  and ripe tannins should make these reds drinkable
  early.  | |
| 
2008 | 
An accursed vintage in Burgundy, with coulure, mildew and hail all
  conspiring to damage yields and quality. Late September sunshine went some
  way to rescue the crop, however, although high acidity remains the hallmark
  of this vintage.  | |
| 
2007 | 
A dank summer led to rotten Pinot Noir grapes and the need for
  extremely strict selection. The vintage is unlikely to notch up record
  scores. | |
| 
2006 | 
Poor summer with vine health problems produced wines which at
  their best are very pure and expressive and at their worst just a bit too
  austere for comfort. | |
| 
2005 | 
As in Bordeaux, a quite exceptionally good vintage, although
  many wines may go through a prolonged stage of chewy adolescence | |
| 
2004 | 
Large vintage of far from flashy but pretty serviceable and certainly
  good value wines. Relatively light and crisp, for early drinking though the
  best may surprise in the long run | |
| 
2003 | 
A small proportion of monumental wines from old vines were
  produced this heatwave year, but generally the frail Pinot Noir grape
  suffered raisening and made some very unusual wines indeed, some of which
  provide good, luscious drinking at about five years old but dry tannins are
  expected to make their presence increasingly felt. | |
| 
2002 | 
Good vintage. Summer was not especially hot, though it was
  reasonably dry. Sugar levels were boosted in September but some grapes were
  adversely affected by scattered rains then. Sugar levels were quite
  respectable in the end and most wines showed their charms at an early stage. | |
| 
2001 | 
Wet summer with some heat spikes. As for red Bordeaux from
  this vintage, a gentle hand was needed in the winery to retain delicacy and
  not emphasize the already notable tannins. Quite varied quality. Wines from
  low-yielding grapes will provide exciting long-term drinking but others are
  gawky. August hail in Volnay. | |
| 
2000 | 
A difficult vintage for growers, with rain and rot during
  harvest. Rather soft, easy wines that were more successful in the Côte de
  Nuits than in much of the Côte de Beaune. Useful early drinking but showing
  signs of losing fruit by 2008 | |
| 
1999 | 
Exceptional quality and quantity. Powerful, charming and well
  balanced with great concentration and color - particularly in the Côte de
  Beaune. The Côte de Nuits was hampered by a little more rain. Tannins and
  pigments achieved sumptuous ripeness. A vintage to drink young or old. | |
| 
1998 | 
Thick skins made for good colors but pretty tough and stolid
  wines in general. | |
| 
1997 | 
Charming, early-drinking wines – most should have been drunk
  by now. | |
| 
1996 | 
Remarkably high acidity has made its presence increasingly
  felt over the years in bottle. Some wines just too tart for comfort; others
  may eventually bloom. | |
| 
1995 | 
Reduced crop of initially rather austere wines which took on
  fat in bottle and can provide delicious drinking now | |
| 
1994 | 
A year to highlight Burgundy's infamy for variability as too
  many let yields balloon after the rains. | |
| 
1993 | 
Underrated. Better than average: healthy grapes and
  well-colored, fruity wines that have lasted and developed well. | |
| 
1992 | 
Rain at the wrong time again. Soft, tender wines to drink
  young. | |
| 
1991 | 
Grapes had ripened before it rained and some wines from the
  Côtes de Nuits are excellent. Not to be overlooked. | |
| 
1990 | 
A great success: rich and fragrant. The top vineyards made
  majestic wines but some lesser wines lacked lusciousness. | |
| 
1989 | 
Nearly up to 1990, if not as intense. Some real charmers. | |
| 
1988 | 
Tough and unusually backward, most are densely concentrated
  and the best repaid 20 years’ wait. | |
| 
1987 | 
Natural ripeness was a problem so many over chaptalized. | |
| 
1986 | 
A very tricky year of rain and rot. Careful growers avoided
  the dilution but not a year to seek out. | |
| 
1985 | 
A problem-free year: delicious and fragrant young, but most
  should have been drunk. | |
| 
1984 | 
Poor weather and unripe grapes. One to avoid. | |
| 
1983 | 
A torrid summer and very mixed bag. A handful are brilliant
  but most are tainted by rot. | |
| 
1982 | 
Large yields of soft, pleasant wines best drunk young | |
| 
1980 | 
Underestimated at first: balanced and scented, though most are
  past it now | |
| 
1978 | 
A late but uniformly good crop. Top growers made breathtaking
  wines. Now very rare. | |
| 
Grand Cru Vineyards
  of Chablis | |
| 
Village | 
Grand Cru | 
| 
Chablis | 
Chablis Grand Cru: White 
(This designation may be followed by
  the name of the climat in which the wine originates such as Blanchot, Bougros, Les Clos, Grenouilles, Preuses, Valmur
  and Vaudésir) | 
| 
Grand Cru Vineyards
  of Côte Nuit | |
| 
Village | 
Grand Cru / Wine
  Style | 
| 
Gevrey-Chambertin | 
Ruchottes-Chambertin: Red 
Mazis-Chambertin: Red 
Chambertin-Clos-de-Bèze: Red 
Chapelle-Chambertin: Red 
Chambertin: Red 
Charmes-Chambertin: Red 
Griotte-Chambertin: Red 
Latricières-Chambertin: Red 
Mazoyères-Chambertin: Red | 
| 
Morey-Saint-Denis | 
Clos-de-la-Roche: Red 
Clos-Saint-Denis: Red 
Clos-des-Lambrays: Red 
Clos-de-Tart: Red 
Bonnes-Mares: Red | 
| 
Chambolle-Musigny | 
Bonnes-Mares: Red 
Musigny: White and Red | 
| 
Vougeot | 
Clos-de-Vougeot: Red | 
| 
Flagey-Echézeaux | 
Grands
  Échezeaux: Red 
Échezeaux: Red | 
| 
Vosne-Romanée | 
Richebourg: Red 
La-Romanée: Red 
Romanée-Conti: Red 
Romanée-Saint-Vivant: Red 
La-Grande-Rue: Red 
La-Tâche: Red | 
| 
Grand Cru Vineyards
  of Côte de Beaune | |
| 
Village | 
Grand Cru | 
| 
Pernand-Vergelesses | 
Charlemagne: White 
Corton: White and Red 
Corton-Charlemagne: White | 
| 
Aloxe-Corton | 
Charlemagne: White 
Corton: White and Red 
Corton-Charlemagne: White | 
| 
Ladoix-Serrigny  | 
Charlemagne: White 
Corton: White and Red 
Corton-Charlemagne: White | 
| 
Puligny-Montrachet  | 
Bâtard-Montrachet: White 
Bienvenues-Bâtard-Montrachet: White 
Montrachet: White 
Chevalier-Montrachet: White | 
| 
Chassagne-Montrachet  | 
Bâtard-Montrachet: White 
Criots-Bâtard-Montrachet: White 
Montrachet: White | 
Wines Tasted
The following are
the wines that were tasted in the French Wine Scholar program:
1. 2011 Vincent Giradin St. Aubin 1er Cru “Les Murgers Des
Dent De Chien”
A clear white wine,
straw in color with green hues and moderate viscosity. On the nose it is clean
with subtle aromas of apple, pears, melon, lemon meringue, with minor notes of
wet stone. On the palate it is dry with high acid, light in body with a medium+
length citrus driven finish. This wine sells for $40.
2. 2012 Antoine Jobard Meursault “En La Barre”
 
A clear white wine,
golden-straw in color with medium viscosity. On the nose it is clean with
subtle aromas of baked apples, crème broulet with a minor hint of butter,
creamed corn and toasted bread. On the palate it is dry with medium+ to high acid
and yet creamy and medium bodied with a long finish. A very fine well-balanced
and elegant wine. This wine sells for $94
3. 2008 Louis Latour Corton-Charlemagne Grand Cru
 
A clear white wine,
golden-straw in color with a slight green hue and medium viscosity. On the nose
it is clean with moderate intense aromas of caramelized apples, subtle notes of
butterscotch, marshmallow, lemon pie with subtle notes of pencil shavings. On
the palate it is dry with medium+ acid, it is medium bodied with a long finish.
This wine sells for $120.
4. 2013 Regis Bouvier Marsannay Rose
 
A clear pink wine
with moderate viscosity. On the nose it is clean with moderate intense aromas
of strawberry candy, watermelon-juice and cranberries. On the palate it is dry
with medium+ acid, light body with a long finish with flavors of lingering tart
strawberries. This wine sells for $23.
5. 2011 Joseph Voillot Volnay Vielle Vignes
 
A clear red wine,
ruby in color at the core to pink at the rim with moderate viscosity. On the
nose it has subtle aromas of cranberry juice that has been stored in a rubber
tire, black cherries, and minor notes of anise, herbs and spice. On the palate
it is dry with moderate tannins, medium+ acid and a moderate length finish. This
wine sells for $50
6. 2011 Francois Bertheau Chambolle Musigny
A clear red wine,
ruby in color at the core to slight garnet at the rim with moderate viscosity.
On the nose it has subtle aromas of cherry, ripe cranberries, strawberries, with
minor notes of mushrooms and herbs. On the palate it is dry with moderate-
tannins, medium+ acid and a moderate length finish. This wine sells for $60
7. 2012 Regis Bouvier Morey St. Denis “En La Rue De
Verge”
A clear red wine,
ruby in color at the core to slight garnet at the rim with moderate viscosity.
On the nose it is clean with moderate intense aromas of ripe strawberries,
bacon, smoke, and mushrooms with a hint of pepper and spice. On the palate it
is dry with moderate tannins, medium+ acid and a moderate length finish. Out of
the line up of Pinots this is the one that has what you’re looking for in a red
Bourgogne! This wine sells for $56.
8. 2012 Domaine Pierre Guillemot Corton Grand Cru “Le
Rognet et Corton”
 A clear red wine, ruby at the core with moderate viscosity. On the nose it has moderate intense aromas of cherries, anise, spice, pepper, cinnamon red-hots, and herbs. On the palate it is dry with moderate tannins, medium
[1] André Dominé, (ed) Wine (Germany: Tandem Verlag, 2008),
180.
[2] Desmond Seward, Monks and Wine (Crown Publishers, 1979), 37.
[3] André Dominé, (ed) Wine (Germany: Tandem Verlag, 2008),
180.
[4] Paul Lukacs,
Inventing Wine
(W. W. Norton & Company, 2013), 70.
[5] Julien
Camus, Lisa M. Airey, Celine Camus (ed), French Wine Scholar Study Manual (French
Wine Society), 89.
[6] Julien Camus, Lisa M. Airey,
Celine Camus (ed), French Wine Scholar Study Manual (French Wine
Society), 89
[7] James E. Wilson, Terroir (University
of California Press, 1998),
108













 
No comments:
Post a Comment