Monday, December 23, 2013

Unit 3 – Day 2: California Red Wines


In my last review I discussed the American Viticultural Area (AVA) system and contrasted it with the French AOC system. I then reviewed 8 white wines that we tasted in the Intensive Sommelier Training at the Culinary Center in Campbell, California.



In this review I’ll provide an over view of California’s wine history, the revival of its wine culture and some of its current challenges. I’ll then discuss Zinfandel, cover the learning objectives and review 8 red wines.



A Brief History of California Winemaking



The four major wine producing regions in the United States are California, Washington, New York and Oregon. California is the top wine producing state in the United States, producing roughly 90% of U.S. wine. While the largest quantity of wine produced in California comes from the fertile Central Valley, premium wine production mostly comes from the North Coast AVA, Sierra Foothills AVA and the Central Coast AVA. Overall California has a warm climate that is often tempered by the Pacific Ocean. The top white grapes are Chardonnay and Sauvignon Blanc (a.k.a Fumé Blanc). The top red grapes are Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Pinot Noir and Zinfandel.



However the first grape to dominate the region was planted by Spanish missionaries in the early 1600s known as the Mission Grape (known as Criolla in Argentia and Pais in Chile). This remained the dominant grape until the early 1900s. It is still found in the Sierra Foothills where some of the oldest vines (140+ years) are still producing wine such as at StoryWinery.



As the United States began to spread west so did its winemaking. New and successful wineries were established along the Ohio River Valley in the 1800s and in Missouri. With the gold Rush of the 1840s it then spread to California as thirsty fortune hunters needed something to drink.




One of the most important forerunners of the California wine culture was Count Agoston Haraszthy (August 30, 1812, - July 6, 1869) who founded Buena Vista Carneros in 1857. He is considered by many to be “The Father of California Viticulture” as he was a man ahead of his time - a visionary who laid the ground work for California’s now lost and almost forgotten wine history and culture (due to the aftermath of Prohibition). A Hungarian-American traveler, writer, town-builder, and pioneer winemaker in Wisconsin and California, Haraszthy was one of the first men to plant vineyards in Wisconsin and an early and important writer on California wine and viticulture. In California he introduced more than three hundred varieties of European grape varietals. Sadly, the recipients of those vines failed to follow his vision for planting quality varietals in the state and instead discarded them in favor of varietals that produced higher volume and more alcohol. In 1856, Haraszthy bought a small vineyard northeast Sonoma, expanded the acreage to 5,000 acres of valley and hillside and renamed it Buena Vista. In 1857, he bore wine caves into the sides of a nearby mountain, built stone cellars at their entrance and two large stone winery buildings, equipped with underground tunnels and the latest wine-making equipment in California. In 1858, Haraszthy wrote the “Report on Grapes and Wine of California.” It was published by the California State Agricultural Society and was the first treatise on winemaking written and published in California, and praised as the “first American explication of traditional European winemaking practices.” In 1863, Haraszthy incorporated the Buena Vista Vinicultural Society, the first large corporation in California (perhaps in the United States) organized for the express purpose of engaging in agriculture. With the support of prominent investors, he greatly expanded his vineyards in Sonoma, making wine which was sold as far away as New York. In 1864, an article in Harper's Magazine proclaimed that Buena Vista was “the largest establishment of the kind in the world.”



The three major disruptions to the history and wine culture of California have been the Phyloxera plague of the late 1800s, the Prohibition (1920-1933) during which only sacramental and a limited amount of home made wine could be produced, the economic impact of the Great Depression (1929) and two World Wars (1914-1918; 1939-1945).

Robert Mondavi and André Tchelistcheff

But California saw a revival in its wine culture in the 1960s to 1980s. A number of frontiersman, such as André Tchelistcheff (Russian: Андрей Челищев, December 7, 1901 - April 5, 1994) and Robert  Mondavi (June 18, 1913 – May 16, 2008), had a vision for the Napa Valley and believed it could rival the finest wine regions of Europe.




They’re vision came to light at the 1976 Spurrier Tasting when two wineries, Chateau Montelena and Stags Leap Cellars, defeated the top wine producers in a blind tasting in France that used French wine critics. This small and seemingly insignificant event was reported in Time magazine and the result was a major paradigm shift in the World of Wine as the myth of the inherent superiority of French wine was defeated.



But California wine production has not been without its challenges as it continues to struggle in the south with the spread of the Glassy Winged Sharp Shooter (Homalodisca vitripennis) pest which infects vines with Pierces Disease (Xylella fastidiosa, a bacterium in the class Gammaproteobacteria). While the problem of Phyloxera can be resisted by grafting vitis vinifera grape vines onto the North American native root-stock of vitis riparia, there is no known cure for Pierces Disease. There are no resistant Vitis vinifera varieties, and Chardonnay and Pinot Noir are especially sensitive, although muscadine grapes have a natural resistance.



The Unofficial Grape of California - Zinfandel




For some time it was thought by many that Zinfandel was a native variety to California, even today, this perception may still exist. It was then held that it was related to, or was in fact the same varietal, as Primitivo – Italy. The development of DNA profiling in the mid 1990’s, led by Carole Meredith at UC Davis, had proven through extensive research, that the grape’s origins are in fact Croatian as Crljenek Kastelanski (pronounced: Curl-yen-ick Kahst-a-lahn-skie). Zinfandel prefers well-drained low fertile soils. It is moderately vigorous and the grapes bunches tend to be very large and ripen unevenly. In order for the bunch to fully ripen the earlier ripening grapes then tend to have high sugar and almost become raisins. This results in wines that tend to have very high alcohol, especially those grown in the central valley and in the Sierra Foothills. Various styles of wine are produced form this grape including rosés, “white zinfandel”, dry wines and fortified port-like wines. Top California Zinfandel producers include: Turley, D-Cubed, Storybook Mountain, Green & Red, Brown Family, Rafanelli, Robert Biale, Ravenswood, Peachy Canyon and Ridge.



Learning Objectives of Unit 3 – Day 2: Southern California Red Wines



At the beginning of class lectures a list of learning objectives is provided to the students. By the end of the class, the students should have a certain degree of understanding from their own reading and the lectures and be able to provide the answers to list of questions. The Learning Objectives for Unit 3 - Day 2 along with the answers are as follows.



By the end of class, students should be able to:



(1) Name the 2 AVAs in Monterey, Santa Barbara and  San Benito Counties

Answer: Santa Lucia Highlands AVA, Chalone AVA (Monterey), Santa Maria AVA, Sta Rita Hills AVA (Santa Barbara),  Mount Harlan AVA, Paicines AVA (San Benito)

(2)  Define the term Meritage.

Answer: A Bordeaux blend made in the USA.

(3)  Explain the origin of the Zinfandel grape variety

Answer: It is derived form the Croatian grape Crljenek Kastelanski

(4)  Recommend 3 California Pinot specialists to a guest:

Answer: Merry Edwards, Koste Brown, Rochioli

(5)  Recommend 3 California Cabernet Sauvignon specialists to a guest

Answer: Stag’s Leap Cellars, Screaming Eagle, Caymus

(6)  Recommend 3 producers of Rhone-wine style wines to a guest.

Answer: Tablas Creek, Bonny Doon, Qupé

(7)  Describe the attributes of any wines tasted today

Answer: See below



The Wines



On the second day of Unit 3 we tasted the following 8 red wines:



1. 2010 Lioco, Pinot Noir, Anderson Valley




A clear ruby-red wine with minor garnet rim variation, day-bright, moderate intensity and medium+ viscosity. On the nose it is clean with subtle aromas of fresh ripe cherries, plums and intense spiciness of cinnamon and cloves followed by a hint of cedar and damp earth. On the palate it has flavors of strawberry preserves and raspberries but spice drives the profile with cinnamon, clove, and black pepper and a hint of cola. It is dry with medium+ acidity, medium- tannin, medium body and a medium length finish. This is an excellent California Pinot that sells for $38. I much preferred this Pinot Noir over the Testarossa.



2. 2012 Testarossa, Pinot Noir, Santa Lucia Highlands




This is a clear ruby-red wine with minor garnet rim variation, medium concentration and moderate+ viscosity. On the nose it is clean with aromas of fresh cherries, ripe watermelon, cranberry, strawberry preserves, and subtle aromas of canned black pepper and cloves. On the palate it is dry, soft on entry, with flavors of strawberries and a hint of cinnamon and all-spice. It has medium+ acidity, medium body, medium+ alcohol and a medium length finish. This wine sells for about $45.



3. 2010 Swanson, Merlot, Oakville, Napa Valley




This wine is clear, dark-red at the core to ruby at the rim with minor variation and medium + viscosity. On the nose it is clean with aromas of ripe black cherries, cocoa, damp earth and a hint of mint. On the palate it has flavors of black cherries, dried plums, dark chocolate, and vanilla. It is dry with medium tannins, medium+ body, medium acidity and a medium length finish. This wine sells for about $30.



4. 2011 Chappellet, Cabernet Sauvignon, Napa Valley




This is a clear dark-red wine with moderate pink rim variation and medium+ viscosity. On the nose it has moderate intense aromas of black currants, blackberries, tobacco leaf, graphite and a hint of mint. It has flavors of black currants, black cherries, dark chocolate, star anise, and oak. It is dry with alcohol sweetness, it has medium+ tannins, medium+ body, medium+ alcohol, moderate complexity and a medium length finish. This wine sells for about $45.



5. 2007 Bonny Doon, Le Cigare Volant, Santa Cruz Mountains




This wine is a blend of 60% Grenache, 31% Syrah, 5% Mourvèdre, and 4% Cinsault. The wine is clear, ruby-red at the core to pink at the rim with minor variation, moderate intensity and medium+ viscosity. On the nose it is clean with subtle aromas of stewed plums, pepper, dried beef and dried herbs with a hint of barnyard from Brettanomyces. On the palate it has flavors of dried plums, cherry liqueur, black olive and a hint of anise. It is dry with some alcohol sweetness, medium tannins, medium acidity, medium+ alcohol, moderate complexity and a medium length finish. For a six-year-old wine this is ageing quite well and it is remarkably old-world like. The only thing it is lacking is the Northern Rhône’s minerality. This wine sells for about $30.



6. 2010 Tablas Creek, Espirit de Beauscatel, Paso Robles




This wine is a blend of 45% Mourvedre, 30% Grenache, 21% Syrah, 4% Counoise. This wine is clear, dark ruby-red at the core to pink with minor rim variation and medium+ viscosity. On the nose it is clean with aromas of cherry liqueur, pomegranates, plums, pepper, dried herbs and a hint of damp earth. On the palate it has flavors of dried plums, dates, and black olive. It is dry with alcohol sweetness, it is soft on entry but it has medium+ tannins, medium+ alcohol and a medium length moderately complex finish. This wine sells for about $26.



7. 2011 Vignobles Yves Cheron Domaine du Grand Montmirail Cuvee, Les Deux Juliette, Gigondas




This wine is obviously not from California but it was tasted in order to form a comparison between a Southern Rhône wine and the two California Rhône-style wines.



This wine is a blend of 80% Grenache, 15% Syrah and 5% Mourvèdre. This is a red wine that is clear to opaque with a dark purple core to violet with minimal variation at the rim with medium+ viscosity that stains the glass when swirled. On the nose the wine is clean with moderate intense aromas of blackberries, plums, cooked strawberries, violets and dried roses. On the palate it is dry with chalky medium+ tannins, medium+ to full bodied, medium+ alcohol and yet silky on entry and across the mid-palate. It has a medium length finish with additional notes of dried cranberries and it retails for about $20.



Observation: It is a little difficult to compare the Gigondas with the previous wines since the blends are not the same. But they are close enough for there would be differences even if we were comparing all Southern Rhône wines. The similarity between these California versions is a lot closer than the similarities/differences between California Chardonnays and Burgundian Chardonnays. There isn't a huge Old World/New World difference between the Gigondas in terms of fruit, alcohol or acidity, but it does have more tannin and a hint of more minerality with the chalk. The Gigondas beats the two Californian wines hands down and yet it is $6 to $10 cheaper.



8. 2011 Fiddletown Cellars, Old Vine Zinfandel, Amador County


A future Master Sommelier took a peak from behind the bottle!


This wine is clear, ruby-red to pink with minor rim variation, it has medium+ viscosity with staining tears. On the nose it is clean with moderate intense aromas of dried plums, red licorice, vanilla and red pepper. On the palate it has flavors of cherry-vanilla, violets, cloves, dried herbs, and dill. It is dry with alcohol sweetness, medium+ tannins, medium+ body, medium+ alcohol and a medium+ length finish. This wine sells for about $20.



Observations



If I can make a general characterization of these California wines in comparison to their old world counterparts, they tend to be more fruit forward with higher alcohol and less minerality. The best in the line-up was the 2010 Lioco Pinot Noir and it was probably the most old-world in style.

After this class we have a break during the holidays so it will be 2 weeks until my next post when we resume our study of New World Wines... until then, have a Marry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

 

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Unit 3 – Day 1: California White Wines




The first wine country travel blog I started was California Wine Tasting Adventures which I later renamed The California Winery Review. I also created a You Tube site to post videos and slide shows. I later started The Oregon Winery Review. I haven’t post anything on it in a while but I hope to do so again in 2014. I then started Erik Wait’s Wine Country Photography to just share the beauty of the wine country. Finally, I created The World of Wine Review with the intent of writing about wines from around the world, excluding California and Oregon.



Since then I have been journaling my way through the Intensive Sommelier Training at the International Culinary Center as part of my studying The World of Wine.



In Unit 1 we had eight 4-hour lessons in which we covered the basics of viticulture, viniculture, still and sparkling wine service, decanting service and tasted numerous wines while learning the wine grid. We then had a summary overview of the entire world of wine. At the end of Unit 1 we had an exam which consisted of 27 questions and a blind tasting of 2 wines, one red and one white.



In Unit 2 we studied France for 10 lessons, 4 hours per lesson at the end of which we had another exam which consisted of 40 questions and a blind tasting of 2 wines, one red and one white.



In Unit 3 we will study New World Wines for 6 lessons and cover Northern California, Southern California, North America, South America, Australia and New Zealand. Needless to say, I am already very familiar Northern and Southern California and have written about and photographed wineries in every wine region within the state in The California Winery Review. But, for the sake of continuity I’ll cover the course material for California in this blog.



Venues, Varietals and Vintages



In the text books and in the course lecture we briefly covered the history of California winemaking. But, what I think is more important to remember and understand is how American wines are regulated and labeled differently than European wines in that they specify the wine’s venue of origin, the grape varietal and the vintage of the wine.



The American Viticultural Area (AVA) system was established in 1978 which they defined as a “delimited grape growing area” which refers only to geographical boundaries with no quality regulations or tasting panels involved. The AVA system is regulated by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) and it differs from the French AOC system and other similar Old World classification systems.



The primary difference between the AOC system of France and AVA system of the United States is that the AVA only stipulates where the grapes are from and the only way that designation can convey quality is if the wineries in the region make the effort to establish a reputation for themselves. To put “Napa Valley” on a label is no guarantee of quality, but the Napa Valley AVA certainly has a higher reputation for quality Cabernet Sauvignon than Livermore, Lodi, or the Sierra Foothills. This is why Napa Valley wineries want to protect the Napa Valley designation and prohibit non-Napa Valley wineries from using the name anywhere on their label.



In theory, an AVA is determined and defined by certain unique geographic, geological and climatic characteristics that distinguish it from other regions. For example, the Los Carneros AVA (which is in both Napa and Sonoma County) is defined by the cooling influence of the San Pablo Bay and the clay soils. The recently designated Coombsville AVA is adjacent to the Carneros AVA and has the same cooling influence from the bay, but it has different soils. However, not all AVAs have such unique identifying characteristics and the geographical lines that define them can at times be determined more by local political interest, such as when they are merely named after the nearest town.



American AVA designations can be very broad only indicating that their wine is from the USA, to more specific narrowing it down to the specific state (such as California), county (such as Santa Barbara), designated region (Napa Valley), or sub-AVA (Oakville). In order to specify these designations a certain percentage of the grapes must come from the stated venue - Country: 75%, State: 75%, County: 75%, AVA: 85%.



Although they are never spoken of in this manner, AOCs and AVAs are essentially a way of controlling an enological brand. In branding you are seeking to establish a standard for quality for the region (or company, winery, etc.) so that people will purchase the product or service even if it is unknown simply because the name of the designation has a reputation for excellence. AOCs and AVAs then establish a list of stipulations that must be met in order for the product to bear the AOC or AVA designation. In the French AOC system the grapes that may be grown in the designated region, the yields, and the production method may all be regulated by the INAO. In contrast, the AVA system is solely based upon geographic boundaries and those wineries within the AVA seek to establish a reputation of quality that is unique for that AVA. Yet at times there may be wineries that are just outside their legal border who have the same geographic and climatic distinctives but they are on the “out” because they failed to have themselves included when the borders of the AVA were drawn. What tends to follow then are legal battles as the wineries on the outlying area wish to be included in the AVA while those who want to maintain exclusivity for the AVA brand seek to maintain the original geographic boundaries.




Another means of conveying quality of a wine is by having a Vineyard Designation on the label which more narrowly defines the source from which the grapes are sourced by indicating the vineyard. This has been a common practice in France for quite some time, especially in Burgundy. One of the first vineyard designated premium wines in California was the 1966 vintage Heitz Martha's Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon. Later examples include the 1975 Robert Young Vineyard Chardonnay from the Sonoma wine estate of Chateau St. Jean. Under U.S. wine laws, if the name of vineyard appears on the label at least 95% of the grapes used to make the wine must come from that vineyard.



The only place in France where it the wine is designated by the grape varietal is Alsace. In the United States the most common designation of a wine is by the grape varietal (Cabernet Sauvignon, Pinot Noir, Chardonnay etc.) of which it must contain at least 75% of that grape. So, a wine labeled Zinfandel may only contain 76% of the grape and the remaining portion may be Petite Sirah, Carignan or any other grape. If not designated by the grape varietal the wine may be a blend with a proprietary brand name (such as Opus One) or they may be simply be labeled as “Red Table Wine”.




It is very common for a wine labeled as Cabernet Sauvignon to contain only 75% of the grape with the other 25% consisting of Merlot, Petite Verdot, or Malbec making it more of a Bordeaux-style blend. Such blends may also labeled as Meritage (an invented term that rhymes with “Heritage”) if they contain all Bordeaux varietals and meet the criteria of the Meritage Alliance.[1]



If the wine specifies the vintage, 95% of the grapes must have come from the designated year’s harvest. If the wine is labeled “Estate” 100% of the grapes must be from a vineyard either owned or leased by the producer. The winery and the vineyards must be located in the same AVA and the winery must crush, ferment, finish, age and bottle wine in a continuous process.




Unlike Italy’s Reserva wines, the designation “Reserve” in the U.S.A. has no legal requirements. But, generally they tend to be wines from what the producer considers to be the winery’s best vineyards or barrels of wine.



These are the general required standards that must be met to have these designations, but individual states and AVAs can be even more restrictive. For example, if the label claims or implies “Oregon,” an Oregon county, or an AVA wholly within Oregon 100% of the grapes must be from Oregon and 95% from that appellation of origin.



Learning Objectives of Unit 3 – Day 1: Northern California White Wines



At the beginning of class lectures a list of learning objectives is provided to the students. By the end of the class, the students should have a certain degree of understanding from their own reading and the lectures and be able to provide the answers to list of questions. The Learning Objectives for Unit 3 - Day 1 along with the answers are as follows.



By the end of class, students should be able to:



(1)  Name the major wine regions of California

Answer: North Coast AVA (Napa, Sonoma, Mendocino etc.), Central Coast AVA (Monterey, SLO, Santa Barbara etc.), South Coast AVA (San Bernadino), Central Valley (Lodi, not an AVA), Sierra Foothills (Amador, El Dorado, etc.)

(2)  State what agency regulates the U.S. wine industry.

Answer: TBB, formerly known as the BATF

(3)  State the USA required % for varietal and AVA labeling

Answer: Varietal Content 75%, Vintage 95%, Origin of Grapes: County 75%, State 75%, County 75%, AVA 85%, 95% Vineyard.

(4)  Name the AVAs in the Napa Valley

Answer: Calistoga, St. Helena, Oakville, Rutherford, Staggs Leap, Oak Knoll, Yountville, Wild Horse Valley, Chiles Valley, Coombsville, Carneros, Diamond Mountain, Spring Mountain, Howell Mountain, Atlas Peak, Mount Veeder,

(5)  Name the AVAs in Sonoma County

Answer: Sonoma Coast AVA, Northern Sonoma AVA, Dry Creek AVA, Rockpile AVA, Alexander Valley AVA, Knights Valley AVA, Chalk Hills AVA, Russian River Valley AVA, Green Valley AVA, Bennet Valley AVA, Sonoma Mountain AVA, Los Carneros AVA, Fort Ross- Seaview AVA, Pine Mountain – Cloverdale Peak AVA

(6)  Name the AVAs in Mendocino County.

Answer: Anderson Valley AVA, Cole Ranch AVA, Dos Rios AVA, McDowell Valley AVA, Mendocino Ridge AVA, Potter Valley AVA, Redwood Valley AVA, Yorkville Highlands AVA.

(7)  Name 5 California sparkling wine producers and their parent company

Answer: Domaine Chandon (Moet et Chandon), Mumm Napa (GH Mumm), Roederer Estate (Louis Roederer), Domaine Carneros (Taittinger), Gloria Ferrer (Freixenet)

(8)  Describe the attributes of any wines tasted today

Answer: See below



The Wines



On the first day of Unit 3 we tasted the following 8 white wines:



1. NV Roederer Estate, Brut, Anderson Valley




This wine is clear, pale-hay in color, with obvious gas bubbles. On the nose it is fruit forward with crisp apples, pears, a hint of cherry and underlying bready and yeast notes. On the palate it is clean, crisp and very fresh with medium+ acidity, medium- body, a medium length finish with moderate complexity. In my last review of Unit 2 Day 10 we learned about Champagne and I reviewed 9 wines. Although I have been to at least a  half-dozen wineries that produce sparking wine in California, I have never reviewed any sparking wines for one reason – I’m just not a fan of sparkling wine. If I want bubbles in my beverage I’ll drink a soda pop. The primary difference between those French sparkling wines and this one is the freshness of the fruit and the lack of minerality in this California wine. Champagne is a cold-continental climate with chalky or a clay-chalk soil and they harvest the grapes at what would be considered under-ripe in other regions. The result is they have very high acidity and high minerality in the wines with the fruit more in the background with the yeasty-bready notes being a major player. This wine sells for about $20.



2. 2012 Dry Creek, Sauvignon Blanc, Sonoma County




This wine is clear, straw in color, star-bright, low concentration and medium+ viscosity. On the nose it is clean with aromas of white grapefruit, juicy green apples, lemon, melon, mango, and white flowers. On the palate it is dry with fresh flavors of tropical fruit, grapefruit pith, lemon-lime with some tartness on the back end. It has medium+ acidity, medium body, medium+ alcohol and a medium length finish. What makes this wine distinctly Californian (or at least New World) are the tropical notes, the lack of minerality and it doesn’t have the intense grassy-herbal notes of New Zealand. This wine sells for about $15, not a bad wine at that price!



3. 2011 Chateau Montelena, Riesling, Potter Valley, Mendocino County




This is a clear yellow-gold wine, star-bright with medium concentration and moderate viscosity. On the nose it is clean with aromas of bruised apples, canned pears, apricots, quince, a touch of honey and petrol. On the palate it is dry with flavors of tangy apricots, lime and green apples. It has medium+ acidity, medium body and a medium+ length finish. Although this wine is only two years old it is already showing signs of aging as this grape tends to do after the first two years. Potter Valley is also a warmer region than Alsace and Germany so the petrol notes tend to be show themselves more readily. This wine sells for about $20.



4. 2012 Melville, Viognier, Central Coast



This is a clear yellow-gold wine with a tinge of green around the edges with low concentration and medium+ viscosity. On the nose it is clean with pronounced aromas of orange blossoms, jasmine, honeydew melon, canned fruit salad, oranges and nectarines. It has flavors of candied quince, vanilla and tropical fruits. On the palate it is dry with some alcohol sweetness, medium+ to full-bodied, medium+ acidity and a medium length finish. I visited Melville Winery in May 2012 and tasted their Chardonnays, Pinots and a Syrah which were impressive. I wasn’t all that impressed with this wine as the alcohol seemed to be a bit out of balance. This wine sells for about $18 - $20.



5. 2011 Joseph Drouhin, Pouillu-Fuisse, France




Obviously this wine is not from California but we tasted it to form a basis of comparison between a French and Californian Chardonnay.



This wine is clear, straw in color, star-bright, low concentration, with minimal rim variation and medium- viscosity. On the nose it is clean with subtle aromas of green apples, pears, white flowers, a hint of green dried herbs, chalk and no obvious signs of any oak. On the palate it has flavors of green apples, stone fruit and chalk. It is dry with a hint of sweetness, medium+ acidity, medium body, medium alcohol and moderate complexity and a medium length finish. What will be an obvious difference between this wine and the Chardonnays that follow is the minerality and the lighter use of oak and restraint on the malolactic fermentation. This wine sells for about $28.



6. 2011 Red Car, Chardonnay, Russian River Valley




This wine is clear, yellow, day-bright with medium concentration, and minimal rim variation. On the nose it is clean with medium+ intense aromas of baked apples, nectarines, toasted marshmallows, butter and popcorn. On the palate it has flavors of apple pie, bananas, vanilla, and roasted nuts. It is dry with medium body, medium+ alcohol and a medium+ length finish. If you like this style of Chardonnay, this wine is well-balanced. This wine sells for about $35.



7. 2009 Thomas Fogarty, Albutom, Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains



This wine is clear, yellow with medium concentration, medium+ to high viscosity. On the nose it is clean with medium+ aromas of quince, baked apples, butterscotch, caramel, vanilla, popcorn and nuts. On the palate it is full-bodied with medium+ acidity, medium+ to high alcohol and a medium+ length finish. It has all the characteristics of a barrel fermented Chardonnay. I reviewed two other Chardonnays in January 2013 from Thomas Fogarty when I visited the winery and the second was similar in its profile, yet I preferred this one. This wine sells for about $46.



8. 2011 Forman, Chardonnay, Napa Valley




This is a clear white wine, straw-yellow in color, day-bright, medium concentration medium+ viscosity. On the nose it is clean with subtle youthful aromas of yellow apples, dried green herbs, thyme, with hints of vanilla, popcorn, and butter. On the palate it has flavors of lemon-lime, green apples and vanilla. It is dry with medium+ acidity, it is full-bodied with medium+ alcohol, moderately complex with a medium length finish. This is a well-balanced California style Chardonnay that shows more restraint than the previous two wines in its use of oak. This wine sells for about $44.



Observations



If these wines are fair representatives of the various styles of California white wines the clear indicators of their origin is the effect that a warmer climate has on the fruit and in the case of the Chardonnays, the tendency to go heavier on the malolactic fermentation and their lack of minerality. However, there were some California wines mentioned in class that we did not taste but I have experienced in my travels (such as Stony Hill Chardonnay) which use no or only neutral oak and are not as heavy in their alcohol.




[1] http://goosecross.com/articles/what-is-a-meritage-wine/